Gore’s House: An Inconvient Truth

gore.jpg

In the ultimate twist if irony Mr Vice President Gore’s house hold energy use has been released to the public.

Gore’s mansion, [20-room, eight-bathroom] located in the posh Belle Meade area of Nashville, consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Nashville Electric Service.

In his documentary, the former Vice President calls on Americans to conserve energy by reducing electricity consumption at home.

The average household in America consumes 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, according to the Department of Energy. In 2006, Gore devoured nearly 221,000 kWh—more than 20 times the national average.

Last August alone, Gore burned through 22,619 kWh—guzzling more than twice the electricity in one month than an average American family uses in an entire year. As a result of his energy consumption, Gore’s average monthly electric bill topped $1,359.

Since the release of An Inconvenient Truth, Gore’s energy consumption has increased from an average of 16,200 kWh per month in 2005, to 18,400 kWh per month in 2006.

Gore’s extravagant energy use does not stop at his electric bill. Natural gas bills for Gore’s mansion and guest house averaged $1,080 per month last year.

“As the spokesman of choice for the global warming movement, Al Gore has to be willing to walk to walk, not just talk the talk, when it comes to home energy use,” said Tennessee Center for Policy Research President Drew Johnson.

In total, Gore paid nearly $30,000 in combined electricity and natural gas bills for his Nashville estate in 2006.

An Inconvenient Truth, collected an Oscar for best documentary feature, however maybe Gore deserves a gold statue for hypocrisy.

Obesity… Is It Child Abuse?

So in case you haven’t heard… there is an issue in England right now about whether a child should be removed from his home and put into child care services because his mother is allowing him to become obese. The 8-year-old boy weighs 196 lbs. Which brings up an interesting question… is allowing your child to become obese essentially a form of child abuse?

It’s a tough one. In this particular case, the mother has sought help from professionals in trying to help her child to lose weight, but then has refused to implement their plans for doing so– putting a lock on the refrigerator door, and not feeding him junk food. Her argument is that the boy will only eat processed foods, will spit out fruits, vegetables, and healthy foods, so in an effort not to starve him, she allows him to eat the junk food. But come on… 196 lbs? That’s a lot of junk food even for an adult.

The women is obviously not doing everything she can to prevent the child’s obesity. If she refused to give him junk food, he would eventually get hungry enough that he would eat the fruit and vegetables. He won’t starve himself. She could also, for lack of a better term, force him, to get more physical activity by taking him to the swimming pool, going to the park with him, etc. He is apparently not getting much exercise, but at 196 lbs, it may be difficult for him to do much more than walk. But even going on walks with him would help.

Even if we agree there is more she could do, is allowing your child to overeat a form of abuse? It isn’t causing the child any physical pain– at least not now, although the onset of Diabetes is probably imminent. It isn’t causing the child any emotional pain directly– although chances are, he is alienated from other children daily because of his size… but children alienate each other for plenty of other reasons too. So is it abuse?

If it is abuse, then it follows the child should be removed from the home to prevent such abuse. But is it really better for a child to be taken from his mother and placed in foster care which is inherently traumatic for kids, especially if that mother is loving and nurturing in every other sense? Does that really benefit the child?

If it is abuse, then what criteria do we use to decipher abuse from a child who simply is overweight. Is there a height/weight scale? Who gets to come up with that? Do we just wait around for extreme cases like this and if it’s extreme enough that we all agree the child is obese, then we label that parent abusive?

Personally, I’m not sure what the best way is to deal with this. I would love to think that parents would do everything they can to make sure their children are healthy and have the means to integrate well with their peers. I’d like to think that parents would want to prevent Diabetes, joint problems, heart attacks in their kids. I would like to believe that an adult can look at their child, see what’s happening, and be the strong party that makes strides to improve it. But we can’t really assume adults will do that for themselves.

With all the debate about what constitutes abuse these days… this is definitely food for thought. Children can’t make these kinds of decisions for themselves. They rely on parents to decide what is okay for them to eat, just like parents decide when it’s okay to cross the street, or keep them from running up and trying to touch a stray dog. I realize a child may want to eat junk food instead of vegetables, but it’s a parent’s responsibility to limit how much junk food he/she can consume, and children will eat what they are taught to eat. A child who’s never had a McDonalds cheeseburger won’t demand that over a piece of fruit.

Can it Get Any Stranger?

Just when I thought the whole Britney shaving her head had reach a point where.. it was just beyond strange… (you know i is bad when k-fed looks stable), a video turns up today in the news of Anna Nichole Smith reaching out to Britney to try and help her “deal” with the overwhelming media attention she gets.

Note to Britney: When Anna is reaching out to you..(because SHE is noticing your a mess) your career is pretty much over and you have reached new levels of messiness.

Sex Sites and Lawsuits

Another fucking fuck-up that pisses me off.

James Pacenza, a 58 year old New York man who was let go from his job at IBM for continuing to visit adult chat rooms during work time (after being warned not to) is suing the company for $5 Million.

He’s claiming protection under the American with Disabilities Act because he feels that the stress he incurred during his tour of duty in 1969 in the Vietnam War has caused him to develop an Internet sex-addiction. I’m sorry… wtf????

How in the world is any of this IBM’s problem???

Pacenza is claiming that employees with drug addictions are given treatment– not dismissal at IBM– and that he deserves the same– for IBM to pay for his treatment and give him another chance.

I’m sorry, but this is one of those that just gets so far under my skin, I can barely stand it. Here’s another asshole who wants to be completely unaccountable for his actions and then claim he’s a victim and should be given a ridiculous amount of money for a transgression he created. Somewhere in his twisted thinking, he believes IBM should pay him for wasting time while he was working and continuing to break a rule they’d warned him not to break. It’s cases like these that make me wish I were a judge.

I think it’s disgusting how these losers think they can bilk large corporations for ungodly amounts of money when they aren’t even competent enough to hold down a job, and have probably already wasted enough of the company’s money earning paychecks while doing something completely unrelated to work on work time. I’m also sick of people blaming their stupidity on some trauma that happened years ago. Pacenza saw his friend get killed while in the army. That somehow makes him incapable of enough common sense to stop having sex chats on his computer during the time he’s supposed to be working? Please. Seriously… how do you come up with that without busting out in fits of laughter?

I hope IBM files a counter suit, denying Pacenza any unemployment benefits, and wins, and then I hope his wife divorces him and every company in the New York area reads the CNN report about his pathetic suit and refuses to hire him. That’s my wish for this asshole and every other lazy fuck-up who thinks they’re entitled to more than everyone else because they’ve had a rough life. Guess what… we live with the decisions we make, and sometimes the consequences of decisions are more clear cut than others (like say… being warned that the next time you visit a sex site at work you’ll be fired– how much more clear can it be?). So deal with it, Pacenza.

What’s Your Drink?

polish-vodka.jpg

Normally “what’s your drink?” suggests congenial hospitality, however in the European Union it has sparked an angry trade dispute that’s pitting country against country. Right now regional regulations state that vodka must be made from “agricultural products” and so it is: potatoes, grapes, grain, sugar, beets and other foods. Poland which produces 50 percent of the vodka in Europe says this definition is too broad. The Polish feel Vodka is a product of only grain, cereal or potatoes anything else is just not worthy of the name.

The European Commission is set to vote in March to decide whether 10 percent of Europes colorless liquor makers are victimizing consumers. Non-traditional producers insist that vodka derives its taste from the production process, not the raw materials, however the Polish clearly do not agree, arguing that consumers can clearly tell the difference.

However, inconveniently for Poland consumers don’t seem to know it. When Parliament held a blind taste test for its members in May, only one in 10 could identify the ingredients correctly. A study by the BBC in September found that testers were right only 15% of the time and a survy by the Vodka Alliance, found that in most European countries, the vast majority of drinkers described voka’s taste as “nothing” or “alcohol.”

There was one notable exception to this, in Poland, the most common response was “bad.”