And the Witch Hunt Begins…

Posted on January 19th, 2006 by Christine.
Categories: Current Events & Politics.

Andrew Jones, the head of his very own organization titled the Bruin Alumni Association, has publicly offered to pay UCLA students for notes and tapes of lectures given by professors who give commentary with a liberal-slant. Jones– who created the organization and is paying himself a salary to run it (despite the fact it’s a non-profit entity), is sick of professors giving a liberal point of view as they teach.

Jones graduated last year and prior to that, was the head of UCLA’s Bruin Republican student group. So far, he has created a list called “The Dirty 30″ of thirty professors who he has deemed to have liberal agendas.

Jones defends his organization by saying he just wants to maintain the professional level of education at UCLA, and that he’s concerned with the quality of professionalism he’s seen in professors in recent years. So he’s created this watchdog group of which he is the only paid member… to try to blow the whistle on these professors and I guess get them fired…???

My feeling on this, is that it’s the university’s responsibility to monitor the “level of professionalism” of the faculty they hire. And obviously, if a particular professor were getting lots of complaints from students about being biased, the university would not jeopardize their reputation by extending that professor’s tenure.

Second, at the college level, I think it’s okay for professors to include commentary as long as they aren’t teaching their opinion as fact. I had lots of teachers who had definite opinions on the subjects they were teaching about, but as an intelligent adult– which I would hope one is if they’re admittted into a decent college like UCLA– I also have the ability to use my own discretion to separate fact from commentary. As a matter of fact, exposure and development of that skill is something that will help a person’s critical thinking skills for a lifetime.

This type of behavior is very typical of Bush supporters, right-wing nut jobs, and the like… it reminds me of the student who made a big hoopla over a satired poster of President Bush advertising a political satire play at his high school. Let’s not forget that everyone has the freedom of speech, and the right to their own opinions. While I would hope that a UCLA class curriculum is more than just a professor giving his opinion (liberal or conservative), he does have the right to express his own views, and students have the right to disagree with them.

Colleges are supposed to be places of higher learning… where real-world critical thinking skills are taught… where you take all the boring facts you learned in high school and finally figure out how they apply to the world you live in. At least that’s what it should be… and if Andrew Jones is really that intimidated by professors teaching their own classes (which they are more qualified to do than he is mind you), and really believes that college students exposed to those opinions will… what? Spontaneously combust? Be swayed to vote Democrat? I’m not sure why he’s so worried… then he obviously doesn’t have much faith in the conservative viewpoints if simple exposure to something liberal can prompt everyone to change their mind. And he also doesn’t have much faith in the university that afforded him his degree, nor does he have faith that by the time you reach college, it should be a given that you have enough of a mind of your own to discern opinion from fact.

Personally… I think little Andrew Jones just wanted to get a salary without getting a real job. And I think he likes the attention. -D

12 comments.

Smart or Dumb??? »« Congrats to Christine

Ben the Kingpin quibbed this

Wait, the whole nation knows that UCLA is a red/commie/terrorist cell network pretending to be a university.
Why do we need this pissant to “prove” it?
It’s like proving that water is wet.

January 19th, 2006

Christine the Lioness said this

Yeah! And their football team sucks! Beat the Bruins!!! -)

January 19th, 2006

Ben the Kingpin added

Sports should be outlawed in every place of learning. It is a mindless distraction that hampers the intellectual development and drags the school into a mire of “jock think”.

January 19th, 2006

Christine the Lioness stated

Ben… the integration of spirit, mind, and body has proven time and again. If one is neglected, the other two suffer… we need all three to be complete human beings. Now the body part of that can be just taking care of your body… eating right, working out, etc. But that is all a part of athletics and competition is key to bettering oneself in most aspects of learning…

By the way… what is “jock think?”

January 19th, 2006

Christopher the Pyro uttered

I think congrats to Andrew Jones for doing something about an issue that he obviously see’s as a problem, while I’m not sure I agree that teachers shouldn’t teach with commentary he is certainly entititled to have that opinion, it is afterall a free county. I also have to admit I’m impressed his creativity.. basically he saw a problem and found a profitible way for himself to attack it… I really don’t see much differnece between what he is doing and a million other watchdog groups include PETA, ACLU and NRA more power to him. Christine will argue that because he doesn’t have a “board” it’s a little iffy but the truth is all organizations start out small without a board and then eventually hire a bunch of their friends to be their board and it’s really in the end not a whole lot different the not having one at all. As for this being typical behavior by “bush supporters” I don’t know about that, I really doubt we want to get into compairing wacky behavior by supporters of any political group.. (remember Farienheit 911 a movie that was basically one big long fabrication and manipulation of video and audio) and just because MM is a nutjob that doesn’t mean I would group all liberals into the MM nutjob catagory most saw right thru that bull shit, some extremist didn’t but hey they really don’t matter anyway.. and I think this might be the same type of situation.. if a professor is so outragious that what this guy is doing actually ends up matter then it is good, but for the most part I think it will be ignored because the professors probably arn’t that outragious anyway.

January 19th, 2006

Ben the Kingpin hunt n' pecked this

Christine,
The average university student is required to complete 1 or 2 credit hours of physical education to graduate. The *VAST MAJORITY* of university athletics programs focuses on an extremely small minority of students.
In fact, it is much more a matter of money, business and cashflow than it is about learning or education.
“Jock think” is best exemplified by the operating of universities who use their sports programs to draw in a huge amount of cashflow so the administration can have high salaries and they can build massive stadiums and sports programs, but end up spending more than their income on said programs until they totally eclipse the academics for which the school was constructed.

January 19th, 2006

Christopher the Pyro spake, and sayeth

Ben, most schools with bigtime sports programs actually use the revenue say from football to fund the other 300 sports that lose money every year, they build new EDUCATIONAL buildings and when they do need something for the major sports programs then it isn’t comming from tuition becuase teh sport actually pays for itself. It’s a win win for everybody.

January 19th, 2006

Christine the Lioness remarked

And this is bad how???

January 19th, 2006

Ben the Kingpin chimed in with

Christopher,
Not according to the documentation I’ve been researching lately. Most big universities invest more in their sports programs than they bring in. They originally were lulled into the “easy money” idea of sports programs, but as programs became more competitive, they soon found that the $5,000,000 they got for broadcasting rights needed to be spent on upgrading their electrical systems to handle all the cameras, added security, construction and advertising and discovered (whoops!) they just spend $6,500,000 to do all that.
It’s a lose/lose proposition.
Large sports programs cost more to operate than they bring in revenues. They tend to attracts students on the lower-end of academic performance. There are huge drop-out rates amongst those taking a “heavy phys ed” list of classes. There is an extremely small percentage of jobs available for phys-ed graduates. (side from jobs with the phrase: “Do you want fries with that?”)
Large sports programs are counterproductive to an educated and productive populace. Period. They consume more than they provide. They are entertainment–”bread and circuses”. They don’t just have zero value to our society, they provide NEGATIVE value.

January 20th, 2006

Christopher the Pyro said this

Ben.
Not sure where your getting for facts.

Let’s use Penn State as an example because it is close to my heart.
All Athletic Income: $39,682,389
All Athletic Expenses: $39,349,249

Football brings in: $28,005,252
Football costs: $5,771,342
So basically in many ways football is picking up the bill from a whole lot of sports losing money.. but it is basically covering all the spending at the school on sports.. now $39 million sounds like a lot.. but only until you actually look at the overal budget for PSU.

Total operating income: $3,044,868,000 (yes that is 3 as in BILLION)
Expenses:
Instruction: $566,382 (million)
Research: $489 104 (million)
Public Service: $126 802 (million)
And a hole bunch of others that I didn’t feel like posting the point is, $39 million for sports is a like 1% of total budget.

It also sounds like you were implying that students that are in athletics only choose phyisical education degree’s that is asnine and you would have to show me some supporting data. As for graduation rates: Penn State has Graduation Success Rate of 84 percent, significantly above the national GSR average of 65 percent.

Also, have a “negative” value is worst then having zero value… maybe we need to sign ya up for complex numbers 101.

January 20th, 2006

Christine 2 the Mercenary spake, and sayeth

Hahah..yea I have to agree with Chris here on this one. I went to University of Georgia, which has a HUGE football program. A lot of the other sports get overlooked, but I think the key to a good university is variety. I am the furthest thing from athletic, major in journalism, and can barely force myself on a treadmill. I like things like poker, pool, and playing soccer with MY DOG. Yet, I still think a very important aspect to education is providing opportunities for people to be well-rounded. Although UGA tends to show a lot of favoritism for the athletes, the requirements for the football players are also extremely strict. I have met more than a handful of football players that are actually Pre-Med (from different schools, not just UGA). The point is, if you are destined for a professional sport, yay for you. But if you just happen to be a damn good football player, there is no reason that you shouldn’t be able to use a physical talent to give you an opportunity to pursue a higher education. I think that stating that Football schools attract students on the “lower end of academic performance” is not only closeminded, but a little hostile. Yea, maybe not all the football players are brain surgeons, but using that stereotype to support a poorly founded argument just doesn’t work. That’s like saying that people who are insanely good at art should only go to art schools, because they didn’t get a 1500 on the SAT. And btw, UGA also has one of the best business schools in the southeast, so I’m pretty sure their figures show a postive value after football season. We even had a friggin LOTTERY to get tickets, because so many other people were buying them. If you were a student on campus, and didn’t win the lottery, you couldn’t buy the tix from the school. They had a whole ranking system with alumni at the top, last year students, and so on for the priority of who got tickets. I smell money. Lots of it.

January 21st, 2006

Christine the Lioness scribbled

I think you’re alone on this one, Ben… I haven’t been able to find anything to support your claim that college athletics costs more than it’s worth. College athletic programs bring in money… period. As a matter of fact, it seems that it not only supports the athletic program, but academic programs and necessities like student centers, dorms, campus upgrades, and the like.

January 21st, 2006

Feed for Battle of the Sexes : Chris vs Chris

Leave a comment

Names and emails are required (emails aren't displayed), url's are optional.

) (w) (u) p (y) (n) d (*) o) 8) ( (f) (g) (t) o (8) (l) (i) x (~) (e) $ (&amp) (c) ( s (d) (o) (@) (p) (^) (b) [


Fatal error: Call to undefined function show_subscription_checkbox() in /var/www/vhosts/chrisvschris.com/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/vistered-little-cvc/comments.php on line 93