Christopher the Pyro hunt n' pecked this
This idea is flawless… and like Christine said.. as are most of my ideas.

Trouble the Pirate added
Sorry to burst your bubble Chris, my country [the Cayman Islands] has been functioning quite well on this type of system for a couple hundred years? or thereabouts. Many people believe we are a ‘tax-haven’ under the simplistic premise that we do not have ?income-tax? like the majority of the rest of the world. Tax is tax, no matter how you shroud it, but the manner in which it is collected by the government can greatly alter its effectiveness.
The pro’s you guys stated are very much real, but there are also a few con’s to be found.
Here, we pay a mandatory ‘duty’ [~20%] to the government on every product or resource that is imported at the time of clearing customs; Cars [27.5% minimum], food, toys, electronics, building materials etc? Basically, if you want, or need it, you pay ?tax? on it.
There are a few exceptions that have reduced, or waived fees, such as; baby food, disabled vehicles, books, certain medicines etc? but on the other hand, certain luxury vehicles, jewelry, alcohol, tobacco products etc? are charged increased duties.
This ensures a good basic cash flow for the government per annum. The government departments are split into self-running ?authorities?; Roads, schools, airports, etc? Which operate independently from the actual government, have their own incomes and expenditures that are closely monitored and audited by the government. Profits from these ?departments? also supplement the overall GDP. Real estate transactions, new construction, bank transactions, travel, and miscellaneous things also have % fees applied to them to further suplement the general coffers…
The up-side? We have negligible national deficit [accrued simply to maintain credit with certain countries? Which shall remain nameless], our money is worth 20% more than the US dollar on the world market, and we enjoy a [hard-earned, contrary to popular opinion] much higher standard of living than even the most affluent areas of the US. This is not an accident. We have a few illegals here too, but they are forced by the system, to pull their own weight, or go without, or move on?
The down-side? We pay US$3.65 for a loaf of bread, US$4.65 per gallon of gas, US$4.50 per pack of cigarettes, US$35 for a bottle of Bacardi, and 19 US cents per kilowatt-hour for electricity?
Ben the Kingpin up'n wrote this
Bear in mind that by making things that simple, you are actually killing two industries, and destroying the jobs associated:
1) Tax preparers and CPAs in general–most deal in taxes in one way or another.
2) IRS itself–which is a MONSTROUS organization that employs THOUSANDS.
However, I like the ideas.
I’d just like to see a system where *everyone* was taxed *equally*. Right now the wealthy pay nearly nothing because they couch all their expenses in small businesses–which deduct expenses from profits before paying taxes. If all taxation was incorporated into purchasing, then everyone would pay taxes (except for the small businesses, who would simply charge that as an expense and the wealthy are still unaffected).
So, in combination, make it so that corporations (all of them) pay taxes at the same rate and cannot deduct their expenses from their profits and only pay on the profits. (That would SEVERELY change the tax base of this nation…)
Christine the Lioness uttered
Actually, Ben… I tried to find the figures on how many individuals the IRS employs and couldn’t find them anywhere online (which I thought was weird). Do you have that statistic? I would guess it is thousands too, but I was wondering exactly how many thousands…
As for your first point, I know it would change that industry, but CPAs do more than just taxes and to create jobs based on nothing more than inefficiency for the sake of creating jobs doesn’t really help anyone. Besides, creating a federal sales tax would create a whole new faction of the federal government that could employ those people. At least… it seems like it might be equitable or almost equitable. 
Christine the Lioness penned this
By the way, Trouble… the inflated prices for staples (bread, milk, etc)… why is that the case? Because they are imported?
Because the US can and does manufacture a lot of what we consume here, I don’t think we’d be affected like you are in the Islands… we don’t pay sales tax on any food that isn’t junk food, or served in a restaurant, which I agree is how it should be. However, if I wasn’t losing almost a thousand dollars out of every paycheck, I might be willing to pay a little more for things… particularly luxury items like vehicles, jewelry, etc. (well… Christopher should be buying me jewelry
) but you get the point.
Trouble the Pirate scribbled
Christine, because we are a small island, it’s just convenient for the government to ‘tax’ at the port of entry, because just about everything we use MUST be imported.
My point is that the US Gov could levy the ‘tax’ when the products leave the manufacturer [for goods produced in the USA], or even when the goods, or the raw materials are imported to the US.
It’s a pretty good system, because if you can afford a Mercedes 500SL, then you can ‘afford’ the 40% tax also.
In answer to your question, luxury items have a higher rate of ‘tax’, staples like bread, milk, cereal, rice etc… Are at 10%, the higher price of staples may be due to the fact that most are perishable… After a 2 to 3 week trip from the farm, or bakery, sitting in 40 foot containers, they only have a short shelf-life here, and the supermarket owners may have to deal with a lot of spoilage, hence they put a higher mark-up on those items… [I’m really not sure…]
Strangely, some items make their way on to the ‘duty-free’ list, such as ice cream; I can only assume that the ?tax collectors? had a sweet tooth.
And, Actually, most of the IRS staff would still be necessary, they would just be directing their efforts at the producers and importers, rather than the consumers…
Christine the Lioness mentioned
Good info, Trouble. Thanks! 