Christine the Lioness spake, and sayeth
Honestly, I don’t know that much about the situations Christopher is talking about or eminent domain laws, but I would think that a good lawyer could point out that what happened to Didden was not in alignment with the intent of the eminent domain laws which were created to protect the interest of the public, not the interest of one individual over another.
ProphetJoe the Irreverent chimed in with
The “current” thought is that private land seized by the government, then developed by the private sector, will increase tax revenues (and possibly create jobs) thereby “benefiting society” to a greater extent than private ownership would — this is absolutely an egregious abuse of power.
Unfortunately, FAR TOO MANY of the Sheeple in the US think this sort of shit will “help them” because the suckle from the teat of government programs (entitlements). They don’t see it effecting them until someone from the government actually shows up at their door telling them to move out of their family homestead so another Casino can be built… all for the “greater good of society”.
This is a prime reason to appoint strict constructionists to the SCOTUS.
ProphetJoe the Irreverent thought this
Not that I have a strong opinion on the subject…
ProphetJoe the Irreverent up'n wrote this
Wow! I didn’t notice the date on this one… somehow I missed it last year!