Iranians vs. a Strip of Celluloid

Posted on March 15th, 2007 by Christine.
Categories: Current Events & Politics.

When I read on CNN.com today that newspapers in Iran screamed that “Hollywood has opened a new front in the war against Iran” by releasing the film ‘300,’ I almost snorted my diet Coke out of my nose. Wondering when Hollywood– the mecca of all that is faux glitter and glam– became the political seat of the nation, I decided it was important for me to read on. After all, I make a living working in the Hollywood entertainment industry and I need to know if it is now accepted for me to put a title like “Senator” or “Congresswoman” before my name…

The Iranians, who have apparently successfully dealt with all the problems in their country: egregious environmental disasters like the overconsumption of leaded fuel, deforestation, and air pollution; corruption issues like billions of dollars worth of smuggled drugs being routed through Payam Airport; the fact that the Iranian government has been linked to grotesque human rights violations in 21 separate categories of human rights… but apparently, those are all fixed, and now the Iranians need something new… something relevant… something essential to get up in arms about… how Persians were depicted in a negative light against the Spartans in ancient Greece.

“Iranians buzzed with resentment at the film’s depictions of Persians, adamant that the movie was secretly funded by the U.S. government to prepare Americans for going to war against Iran. “Otherwise why now, if not to turn their people against us?” demanded an elderly lady buying tuberoses. “Yes, truly it is a grave offense,” I said, shaking my own bunch of irises.”

Perhaps in Tehran, the scent of tuberoses and irises in the air also carries hints of paranoia.

Why now? Why release a film like ‘300′ now? they ask… I’m no genius, but perhaps because now is the time that Warner Brothers approved the final cut and the film was ready to be released.

The problem here, well, more like “there,” is that Iranians don’t understand that Americans don’t need movies to justify going to war. In the U.S., we go to war without justification at all sometimes. And sometimes we make movies purely for the sake of entertainment and because the studios want to make money. And under this notion of “free speech,” we sometimes make other people look, well… sort of unlikeable… for the sake of drama in those movies. And the fact that Iranians are upset about a movie released in the U.S. about two ancient countries that we have no affiliation with, when most Americans couldn’t even point out Iran on a map– let alone conceive of how Iran and Persia were ever connected, should say something. It should say that maybe… just maybe… we Americans are so self-absorbed and caught up in our own trivial lives, that being entertained on a Saturday night by half-naked actors pretending to be Spartan warriors in front of a blue screen, is maybe not about you, O people of Iran. Maybe you, Iran, in a desperate quest to feel meaningful on this planet, are assigning a meaning to something you shouldn’t.

And maybe, just maybe… it’s much easier to curse an American movie than it is to address some… should I say “prominent” issues in your own country. And so be it. You are certainly welcome to your opinion. But I will say this… if you truly believe that Hollywood could sway national opinion of the war on Iran with a movie about the Greeks and Persians, you are either giving Hollywood too much credit… or you don’t understand capitalism. Or maybe both.

10 comments.

Six Bites for $42 »« The Problem With Belief

Christopher the Pyro hunt n' pecked this

Ouch… Christine.. umm I think we should put off moving in together for a little while.. I’m pretty sure the “Evil Persians” are going to try and assassinate you now and I don’t want to get caught in the carnage.

I seriously have to agree with Christine 100% on this one, while the movie 300 was exceptionally good the idea that the U.S gov somehow funded it, is very laughable. The truly sad part is that the Iranian people are being fed this garbage through their state run media and they are not being allowed to see the movie for themselves and make their own judgment. Now I know the idea of “free men” has always scared the Persians.. err I mean Iranians.. but really it’s ok. Like Christine said.. we don’t need much reason to go to war.. so even attacking our movies might be enough to get Senator Christine to order the attack.

March 16th, 2007

Chaim the Groupie uttered

There also seems to be a misguided notion that the US government requires the will of the people in order to wage war against Iran. This is not the case. No vote will be taken. US funds are more effectively spent on killing people directly than on brainwashing Americans into sanctioning it. History has shown that we Americans are more than happy to brainwash ourselves into supporting a war rather than face up to the notion that our holiest of holy nations just might be wrong about something.

It’s also worth noting that that majority of Ameericans probably don’t even know that “Persia” and Iran are one in the same. They would need Iran’s government to make that connection for them, since it’s never actually made in the film!

March 16th, 2007

Christopher the Pyro thought this

Well this idea that Persia and Iran are one and the same was something I was going to debate, however it is a bit of a mute point but I will say that the Persian empire referred to in the movie 300 is far from today’s Iran in terms of size and power.

Yes the government doesn’t spent much effort in convincing us to go to war, the reality is generally speaking it’s not hard to find a good reason to go to war ( human rights violations, oil, land, ect ). I do think that it is a little naive to think that we as a country spend 500 billion a year on a military and we have been spending this percentage of our GNP for roughly 30 years now and our leaders didn’t think we would need to use the nasty ass military that we have built. The reality is we have had many different leaders since our military build up entered into maybe 6 wars and had fewer then 6000 soldier die. When compared to ancient times or even 50 years ago far fewer soldiers die and they have the potential to accomplish far greater for less the cost.

March 17th, 2007

Christine the Lioness pontificated

I understand though, that the Iranians– because they know the history of their own country and how it relates to ancient Persia– would not consider the fact that Americans don’t know it. But the reality is, we don’t. Americans know far less about the world outside of the U.S. than pretty much anyone in any other country does, barring maybe N. Korea and China. It always amazes me when I go to other countries how much the people who live there know about the politics in the U.S., when I’m usually like…”Uh… and you guys have a Prime Minister… or a President…?” Hehe. Well, that might be an exaggeration, but they still know a lot about us with respect to the political climate. The difference is… what the U.S. does, matters. For Americans, what other countries do, doesn’t matter as much to us and we don’t really care. So I see how Iranians would assume we know more about their history and culture than we do, because I’m sure they know a lot about our’s. But that aside, they are still getting up in arms over nothing. It’s true the gov’t doesn’t need our support, and therefore doesn’t need to brainwash us (although I think they do try to justify their actions with “palatable” reasons to go to war rather than just being honest and saying, hey, they have oil there, we want it, they’re not giving it to us at the price we said we’d pay, so we’re going to go take it.

March 17th, 2007

Mara the Peacemaker stated

I, too thought the assertion was ridiculous as well, but let me just say this: Gerard Butler is HOT and to be honest, that’s all I cared about when I saw 300. Gerard Butler, half-naked Gerard Butler, Gerard Butler and his sexy Scottish accent, how I could have totally been his Queen in that movie…

Okay, I’m done now.

March 18th, 2007

Chaim the Groupie thought this

Hah… And people said that there’s nothing in this film for women…

March 18th, 2007

Christine the Lioness up'n wrote this

Nothing in this film for women??? Ask Christopher how the Leonidus/Spartan Queen role playing went last weekend. -)

Gerard Butler, I have to say, is pretty easy on the eyes. I didn’t even know who he was until this movie and I looked him up on IMDB afterward… and honestly, he’s gotten better with age.

These Iranian women are missing the whole point, I tell ya… -)

March 18th, 2007

Mara the Peacemaker commented

Leonidas/Spartan Queen role playing? I won’t ask.

I’ve been a fan/lusty admirer of Gerard Butler since Lara Croft: Cradle of Life. If I weren’t crazy in love with my other half (who is also very hot, I might add), I would probably be stalker material. Maybe.

Now that I think about it, some of those other Spartans were pretty cute too.

March 18th, 2007

Christopher the Pyro hunt n' pecked this

I don’t know but that Spartan Queen was hot.. (Christine informed me that she was old, but she was hot) I tried to convince Christine that was should replace her wardrobe with ancient spartan women outfits… (300 style).. alas she wasn’t willing to spend the weekend at the tailor having custom outfits made and I had to settle for a few Halloween costumes she had on hand. Which I have to say is a major step up from the Flurries stuff she is sometimes into. Christine really really likes to be referred to as “My Queen” )

March 19th, 2007

Christine the Lioness chimed in with

Well here’s what’s funny about that… the Spartan Queen (played by Lena Headey)… I thought was old when we were talking about her because she had wrinkles around her eyes– I was telling Christopher that yes, she was hot, but that she had those squint lines. So then I look her up on IMDB and she is literally 4 days older than I am. LOL! So I guess she and I are both old. hehe.

And yes… I like to be referred to as his queen… it’s a constant reminder to him to always treat me like one. -)

March 19th, 2007

Feed for Battle of the Sexes : Chris vs Chris

Leave a comment

Names and emails are required (emails aren't displayed), url's are optional.

) (w) (u) p (y) (n) d (*) o) 8) ( (f) (g) (t) o (8) (l) (i) x (~) (e) $ (&amp) (c) ( s (d) (o) (@) (p) (^) (b) [


Fatal error: Call to undefined function show_subscription_checkbox() in /var/www/vhosts/chrisvschris.com/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/vistered-little-cvc/comments.php on line 93